MASON-INTEREST-L Archives

February 2009

MASON-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pelle Evensen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:48:49 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Randy Casstevens wrote:
> Do some random seeds give better quality results for
> MersenneTwisterFast?  I have heard that random seeds should be odd
> numbers, large numbers, and/or prime numbers, but does it matter for
> MersenneTwisterFast?
>   
In short, for any good quality PRNG (the MersenneTwister would be one) 
the choice of seed does not matter at all as far as "quality" goes.

The only thing to possibly worry about is if you start many different 
simulations with nearby seeds. For some generators (depending on how the 
seed is expanded to the internal state of the generator) this will be a 
problem and for some others, it won't be. What the state of the Mersenne 
Twister as implemented in MASON is, I don't know.

A better (or at least safer) approach than the Mersenne Twister would be 
to have a generator that generates distinct streams. This article 
discusses the desirability of distinct streams; 
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lecuyer/myftp/papers/rstream.pdf

Regards,
  Pelle

ATOM RSS1 RSS2