ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

August 2009

ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:35:27 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject:
Re: ADF-tree size
From:
Sean Luke <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Comments:
To: ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Zheng Yin wrote:

> Is this scenario odd? if the ADF does not appear in the main tree howeve 
> the crossover has been done use the ADF tree therefor the individual will 
> be the same before and after the crossover at least in terms of fitness 
> function.  

That's true, but that's just how your individual arranged things.

Sean

ATOM RSS1 RSS2