No, it'd be far to far-reaching a change to make a parameter setting: half of ECJ would be checking that parameter. Sean On Feb 17, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Raymond Shpeley <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Have you considered making this change a parameter setting so it defaults to the > old behaviour unless set? That way we can test runs side-by-side with just a > parameter file change. > > -- ray