ECJers, I am working with a 3-objective problem where some objectives are to be maximized and some are to be minimized with NSGA-II and SPEA2. However I set my parameters, however, all three appear to be maximized. I have tried this: multi.fitness.0.maximize=true multi.fitness.1.maximize=false multi.fitness.2.maximize=false And this: pop.subpop.0.species.fitness.0.maximize=true pop.subpop.0.species.fitness.1.maximize=false pop.subpop.0.species.fitness.2.maximize=false The result still shows pairs like this in the Pareto front, which shows that objective 1 is being maximized: Objective 0 Objective 1 Objective 2 0.2715239 0.28555658 4.0 403 0.2809572 0.26017603 4.0 I'd like to know if I should hunt for a bug in ECJ, or if I'm setting the parameters wrong. Uday told me he observed the same problem some time ago. For now I'm just converting all my objectives to maximization problems manually as a workaround (i.e. by taking the reciprocal of the true fitness). Siggy -- Ph.D student in Computer Science George Mason University http://mason.gmu.edu/~escott8/