Bojan
The keel website has one and/or you can contact them.
Take care
Uday


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Bojan Janisch <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Uday,
>
> I haven't known of KEEL until I've read your mail. I'm missing a proper
> documentation of the framework to use it, even if the frameworks
> suits better for my problem.
>
> Currently I'm working on a representation of a rule as a strong typed
> syntax tree, which also works quite well until now. Don't know how it
> will work on complex data mining rules.
>
> Are there some more detailed documentation and tutorials for KEEL? While
> my project is still in an early state, changing the framework is still
> an easy task and if I've more informations about the functions I could
> start directly in testing the framework for my problem.
>
> Greetings
> Bojan
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: Uday kamath <[log in to unmask]>
> An: [log in to unmask]
> Gesendet: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:42:35 +0200 (CEST)
> Betreff: Re: Evolve Rules with ECJ
>
> Bojan
> Have you looked at KEEL ? http://www.keel.es/
> It has more machine learning and Rule Implementations and some specifics
> for Pitt and Michigan approach. Hope that helps
> -Uday
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Bojan Janisch <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hm... That does not sound good. Wouldn't it be possible to use the
> > GP-package instead and define different types of nodes as different parts
> > of rulecode?
> >
> > I don't want to start from scratch, I don't know how long it will take to
> > create a new representation for my problem. I thought the rule package is
> > so abstract created that it could contain anything?
> > ------------------------------
> > Von: Sean Luke
> > Gesendet: 18.04.2013 21:45
> > An: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Betreff: Re: Evolve Rules with ECJ
> >
> >
>