I&#39;ve been wondering for a while what determines &quot;quality&quot; in GP-software.<br><br>I&#39;ve previously used the proprietary product Discipulus, but didn&#39;t like it due to it&#39;s very closed nature.<br><br>

I&#39;m wondering if there are differences in how different software produce their results, and if the difference will matter.<br>Could there be some solutions that either ECJ or Discipulus (or other product) will find, while the other never will?<br>

<br>I&#39;ve been using ecj for quite a while btw, and think it&#39;s great stuff.<br>
Big thanks to Sean  (And everyone else involved) for all his efforts :-)<br><br>