ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

February 2017

ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Atm Golam Bari <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:44:20 -0500
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="part-7ziB1C9A7aAeAP3ARTppmMkA47DzGhZfWcbiC3Ad8ZI3x"
Reply-To:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (885 bytes) , Capture.PNG (49 kB)
Hi,
I was just understanding how ECJ generational loop works. So, I disabled the cross over using chunk-size = genome size, override produce(....) of  ec.vector.breed.VectorCrossoverPipeline and did not do any mutation there. So, I expect the old and new individuals should be same throughout the run. I am getting ok that part.
 
>>But the index of the old individuals does not match with the index of new individuals. Say individual [10, 20] has index 0 at old population but it gets different index (say index 3) in new population.
>> I understand that newPop inside ec.simple.SimpleBreeder is the array that holds new population and state.population.subpops[subpopulation].individuals[] holds the old population at any time. 

Would you please let me know whether I am missing. Here is the part of parameter file (attached file name : Capture.PNG) .
Thanks for your time,
agb



ATOM RSS1 RSS2