I try to be conservative about ECJ's needs, but we can update it if we really have to. If you're thinking of submitting changes to ECJ, it'd be nice if it were still compatible with 1.6 unless there was a really good reason to do so.
On Jun 21, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Eric 'Siggy' Scott <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Is the version of Java that ECJ is supposed to remain compatible with still 1.6?
> I've been toying around with some potential changes on a fork, and started to use some Java 7 features by habit (such as a switch on strings). Should I refrain from doing so?
> Ph.D student in Computer Science
> George Mason University