No, it'd be far to far-reaching a change to make a parameter setting: half of ECJ would be checking that parameter.
On Feb 17, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Raymond Shpeley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Have you considered making this change a parameter setting so it defaults to the
> old behaviour unless set? That way we can test runs side-by-side with just a
> parameter file change.
> -- ray