LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MASON-INTEREST-L Archives


MASON-INTEREST-L Archives

MASON-INTEREST-L Archives


MASON-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MASON-INTEREST-L Home

MASON-INTEREST-L Home

MASON-INTEREST-L  December 2007

MASON-INTEREST-L December 2007

Subject:

Re: cluster or grid parallelization

From:

Laszlo Gulyas <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

MASON Multiagent Simulation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:49:36 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (116 lines)

Hi All,

Sorry for the delay in answering...

Maciek, thanks for mentioning MEME. The new URL is http://meme.aitia.ai/
-- a new version is to be out any day now... :-)

As for your question: MEME is free of charge, but not open source as of
today. We are looking into the option of making it open source, though.
And also, we are investigating whether we could make it work with MASON as
well, albeit that would certainly require some efforts.

Moreover, we actually have a project in the queue to address the issue of
supporting 'in-run' parallelization of ABM's. That is, we intend to
provide a few templates that would let you distribute your agents/space on
a pool of computers. (The idea is that for certain ABM interaction
topologies pretty efficient algorithms can be implemented and provided to
the user 'under the hood'. Obviously, this won't be a general solution,
but still could help.) The bad news is that we are planning to use Repast
as the base platform.

Best regards,

-- Laszlo
-- 
dr. Gulyás László        | Laszlo Gulyas, PhD
kutatási igazgató        | dir. of research
AITIA International Zrt. | AITIA International Inc.

> Dear all,
>
> Let me add my two cents about #0 and #2. I guess everybody had their
> secret
> stash of sh scripts to do #2 nicely, but MASON would benefit from tool
> like
> MEME (http://www.aitia.hu/model_exploration_modul1, since Mr. Gulyas was
> too
> modest to mention it). Is MEME open source?
>
> With #0 and large number of computationally inexpensive and homogeneous
> agents, MASON could offer new Schedule construct. Using ParallelSequence
> is
> too expensive: it is not economical to spawn a new Thread for each agent
> when execution of agent is sometimes order of magnitude cheaper than
> relevant operations of ParallelSequence. It would be nice to have method
> something like scheduleRepeatingCore, that would result in schedule
> creating
> as many worker threads as there are cores in system, each of worker
> threads
> would than take a subset of agents scheduled using scheduleRepeatingCore
> and
> step them sequentially.
>
> When proper care is taken, any activation scheme (sequential, random,
> Poisson) can be implemented.  Or is there a better way to deal with simple
> agents?
>
> Regards
>
> Maciek
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 8:57 AM, Sean Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> There are three kinds of uses of parallelization here that I'd like
>> to disambiguate:
>>
>> 0  Parallelizing an experiment within a single machine.
>>
>> 1. Parallelizing a single experiment by spreading it across multiple
>> machines that work together.  This  commonly involves one or both of
>> the following tasks.
>>
>>        1.a Distribute the *space* of the world across multiple machines
>>            because it's so big in memory
>>        1.b Distribute the *agents* of the world because their
>>            computational cost is too large
>>
>> 2. Using multiple machines to do multiple experiments, one experiment
>> per machine.
>>
>>
>> #0 is trivial.
>>
>> For #2, shell scripts and rsh do just fine for us; indeed use of PVM/
>> MPI etc., is just way too heavyweight, particularly since Java and
>> MPI don't play well together still.  #2 is also very cleanly done on
>> grid computing solutions.  If anyone's interested, there's a company
>> in my area (Parabon) which negotiates to borrow excess cycles on
>> organizations' PCs and then sells this time with a Java-only piece of
>> grid computing software.  For a large NASA project they've adapted my
>> ECJ code to this system and I'm sure would be interested in tasks you
>> might have in MASON.  Give 'em a call (parabon.com).
>>
>> For #1, I'm very interested in knowing how people are adapting MASON
>> (or RePast) to distribute their experiment.  Do you have 1.a as a
>> need?  1.b?  How are you going about hacking MASON etc. to do it?
>>
>> The reason I ask is that one of our grants may push us to look into
>> creating a version of MASON which does #1 cleanly.  Note that MASON
>> was specifically designed for #2, and indeed *good*, efficient
>> architectures are very different between #1 designs and #2 designs.
>> So we're going to have to think about what kinds new data structures
>> will we need.  Probably at least we'll need a distributed schedule
>> sync device, a way for agents to migrate, and several mechanisms for
>> distributing space.  It's a lot of overhead.
>>
>> I'm interested that some have mentioned RePast.  RePast etc. weren't
>> designed for #1 *or* #2.  I know people have been hacking
>> distribution onto RePast, and am interested in how they overcame the
>> issue of the schedule containing single-machine Java events (repaints
>> etc.).  It might help inform us when we get to working on this.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
February 2020
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
February 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager