Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:02:49 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Maciej M. Latek on 12/06/2007 05:48 PM:
> That is very interesting issue you raise. I understand you are interested in
> fine-grained distributed memory applications: I have experimented recently
> with Proactive. While learning curve might be steep (which is not helped by
> [...]
> What scale of simulation are we talking about that a decent 8 core desktop
> with plenty of RAM is not enough?
Thanks for the lead to Proactive. I'll take a look at it.
Most of my work these days is in biological modeling, which means ~100s
of thousands of relatively homogenous agents per simulation. Coarse
grained simulation (the kind manageable by "shell scripts and rsh",
though I prefer MPI) has worked for me so far. But, I'm about to embark
on a project that might require a much more fine granularity, or more
accurately multi-grain hierarchical agents. I'm just looking for an
evolutionary path to bridge from the current grain to the finer grain.
- --
glen e. p. ropella, 971-219-3846, http://tempusdictum.com
Power never takes a back step - only in the face of more power. -- Malcolm X
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHWLfZZeB+vOTnLkoRAuIxAKCg8oGqUfo881AJTeinTVTh3Zb27wCeKgAe
KnGoFIT4rxU2C00bXKS70UQ=
=8x99
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|