ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

November 2007

ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:41:11 +1300
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject:
Re: Has anyone ever brought up the patent issue?
From:
Matthew Walker <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Comments:
To: ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Robert Baruch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't see any discussion about this in the list archives... was 
> there ever any hesitation about putting an implementation of GP into 
> ECJ considering the patents Koza has on GP? What motivated the 
> decision to include GP in spite of that? Just curious :)

Is there an argument about "prior art"?  
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/genetic_programming/message/2646

ATOM RSS1 RSS2