LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives


ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives


ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ECJ-INTEREST-L Home

ECJ-INTEREST-L Home

ECJ-INTEREST-L  January 2006

ECJ-INTEREST-L January 2006

Subject:

Re: Speed/Space

From:

"Dignum, Stephen A N" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:36:04 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (67 lines)

Thanks Sean,
 
You're probably right in that there is extensive writing to disk at this point.
 
I've run the apps on two different windows machines, one laptop with a whole load of memory and one old desktop with relatively little and they both seem to slow down at the same point which seems odd. I guess this has more to do with Windows' implementation of java than the configuration of the PC. Both are running XP.
 
My main problem seems to be with the ant example, which I've simply doubled the generations* & population size. As some experiments are run with far greater population sizes I was surprised that this was an issue even if there was serious bloat.
 
A test on a Linux/UNIX machine is required!
 
Stephen
 
* This seems odd but I'm doing some research in this area

________________________________

From: ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit on behalf of Sean Luke
Sent: Sun 29/01/2006 19:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Speed/Space



On Jan 29, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Dignum, Stephen A N wrote:

> I'm working through some of the GP examples in the apps directory. 
> All work fine until I start to up the population size (doubling to 
> 2048). I then get an out-of-memory error.

Actually, we use 2048 all the time and don't have much trouble, so 
that's interesting to hear.  Which examples are creating difficulty 
for you?

> To get around this I increase the standard java memory parameters 
> (Xmx, Xms, XX: etc), This works but if I then increase the number 
> of generations past about 65 I get a sudden reduction in 
> performance which isn't due to increase in program size i.e. number 
> of nodes stays about the same. There may be a large increase in 
> program depth but from my understanding of how ECJ works (by 
> looking through the code!) it is the number of nodes that effects 
> performance not depth.

ECJ's memory usage is fairly constant.  In addition to a few small 
constant elements, just after breeding time (the worst memory usage 
case) ECJ has the current population _and_ the previous population 
which was generated from it.

In the GP examples, individuals in the population have a constant 
overhead each: the big loss comes from GPNodes, which take up (last 
time I checked) about 32 bytes apiece.  Compared to other methods, 
it's a memory hog.  I got into significant discussion of this, I 
think, in the last tutorial.

So as the individuals grow in size due to bloat, it's perfectly 
plausible for ECJ to be growing beyond your standard heap size.  But 
a sudden reduction in performance shouldn't ever happen if it's not 
commensurate with a sudden increase in GP nodes.  There is one 
possibility though: you could be out of your sweet spot and are now 
swapping badly.  Could this be problems specific to Windows?  We 
typically run on Linux and OS X.

You can see the current memory usage and swap information by running 
like this

        java -verbose:gc ...

Sean

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
July 2018
May 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager