Happy New Year!
I double checked and I had a typo, breed.elite.0=2 works fine.
P.S. ECJ is great, after less than a day of working with ECJ I am dealing with domain specific issues, not struggling with the EC software.
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 00:08:09 -0500, Sean Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Happy New Year! Yes, it should be breed.elite.0=2 The tutorial had
> not been updated to reflect a change we had made in a recent revision
> of the system. You can double-check to see that this parameter is
> being used with -p print-params=true
> If you're having the _best_ standardized fitness of the generation
> increasing occasionally despite elitism, yes, this would imply a bug.
> There have been bugs in the elitism before, so I'd be interested if you
> can provide a stripped-down version for us to stare out. Also if you
> can get the problem to occur on a unix box it'd be helpful.
> On Dec 31, 2004, at 11:14 PM, Grant Morgan wrote: