Sean Luke wrote:
> We have completed upgrading MASON to use a real-valued schedule. The
> modification is fairly extensive but it will only affect users in
> relatively minor ways (mostly moving from longs to doubles when
> scheduling items).
I'm in favour of this - one of my long/medium term objectives is to move
my simulations over to a hybrid (i.e. discrete event + continuous time)
model, and this will help.
> However it complicates the distinction between
> steps (ticks) and time.
Sorry, I don't understand quite what you mean. Going from discrete-time
to discrete events complicates real-time running and visualisation but I
don't see what effect just moving to a real-valued schedule has.
Rob Alexander (E-mail: [log in to unmask])
Research Associate, Dept of Computer Science, The University of York,
York, YO10 5DD, UK
Tel: 01904 432792 Fax: 01904 432708