On Jul 1, 2004, at 11:02 AM, Matt Hall wrote:
> 4 in the morning - what dedication!
> Thanks for the information. The reason I _think_ I need to do it this
> way is that I require a variable number of terminal types depending on
> what the creature looks like. This I believe is a consequence of me
> needing each sensor to be a terminal with it's own individual value,
> there's no way to make one terminal type that could represent any
> particular individual sensor is there?
If you have a fixed but small (<10?) number of sensors, you could do it
with a plain terminal set. For a larger numger, you might do it with