MASON-INTEREST-L Archives

December 2007

MASON-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sean Luke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
MASON Multiagent Simulation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:23:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
My approach is much more complex:

Shell scripts and rsh.

Sean


On Dec 6, 2007, at 8:48 PM, Maciej M. Latek wrote:

> Glen,
>
> That is very interesting issue you raise. I understand you are  
> interested in fine-grained distributed memory applications: I have  
> experimented recently with Proactive.  While learning curve might  
> be steep (which is not helped by rather unresponsive mailing list  
> for Proactive), after you work out initial problems with deployment  
> it is great fun to work with. The only draw back is that after you  
> transform your agents into Proactive ActiveObjects and create  
> environment based on Proactive Domains, there is no Mason left  
> (Proactive takes care of scheduling). It is possible to have large  
> scale simulation deployed to cluster based on Proactive and small  
> scale desktop Mason one that share 90% of code, in particular you  
> won't have to change neither your agent code or environment code,  
> just things that deal with instantiation and visualization.
>
> Proactive comes bundled with tool called IC2D (Interactive Control  
> and Debugging of Distribution), which is great help when you want  
> to monitor or improve performance of your simulation.  I have heard  
> good things about Network Attached Memory solutions like  
> Terracotta, but have not yet tried them out: they look interesting  
> though. Check out proceedings of last AGENT conference, there are  
> some papers that talk about those issues..
>
> What scale of simulation are we talking about that a decent 8 core  
> desktop with plenty of RAM is not enough?
>
> Regards
>
> Maciek
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2007 7:59 PM, Glen E. P. Ropella < [log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> What toolchains do y'all use for parallelizing your MASON simulations?
> Note that I'm not talking about multi-processor machines but  
> clusters or
> loose collections of networked machines.
>
> - --
> glen e. p. ropella, 971-219-3846, http://tempusdictum.com
> The only way we can win is to leave before the job is done. --  
> George W.
> Bush
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFHWJrpZeB+vOTnLkoRArGkAJ9EW+WG54QD+LMh5gvObwqC7YodkQCeMDBm
> BqymZ5mlZmxgugwz0pqPOX4=
> =WTjs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2