Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:26:52 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll right, guirandom it is. Will include it in the next SVN update.
The generators likely won't couple. In fact I suspect the vast
majority of people
won't even know about the existence of the second one unless they've
read the manual. :-)
Sean
On Aug 22, 2011, at 12:31 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
> My only worry is that the two generators may couple and make the
> period
> shorter. As long as they remain separate (no model code uses the
> guirandom and no gui code uses the model random), it seems OK.
>
> Sean Luke wrote circa 11-08-20 02:31 PM:
>> 1. The random number generator is presently called "guirandom". I
>> could
>> call it "random", which would be consistent with state.random, but
>> I'm
>> worried it'd confuse people. Should I not be worried? Or can anyone
>> think of a better name? These variable names last forever.
>
> I think it's useful to use a different name and "guirandom" is nice.
>
>> 2. The generator is created at GUIState construction time and is
>> never
>> recreated thereafter (unless you want to do so yourself). I think
>> that's the proper strategy.
>
> FWIW, I like that. The guirandom lives as long as the gui lives.
>
> --
> glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://tempusdictum.com
|
|
|