Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:18:11 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yeah, that's a documentation error. But before I change it, any opinions?
SimpleProperties is kind of in flux. I added the ability to sort the properties arbitrarily (not documented), and the sort based on an array of strings representing property names (the poorly named makeFilterComparator(...) -- I will change that method name). And the ability to sort alphabetically. And of course no sorting.
Originally I was going to make alphabetical sorting the default. But I've since found that alphabetical ordering can be a real pain. People put methods in their source code in a specific order *on purpose*, and alphabetical ordering totally messes with that. So I removed the alphabetical ordering default but kept it as an option. What's your opinion on this?
Sean
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:21 AM, Christian Meyer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that SimpleProperties gets initialized without a
> sortComparator (null), although documentation states that it sorts
> alphabetically by default.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian
|
|
|