Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Aug 2015 23:41:14 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something.
Sent via space magic.
> On Aug 7, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Axel Kowald <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I wonder if there is an agreed upon notation for the representation of
> agent rules?
>
> Since agents can perform arbitrarily complex rules the general answer is
> probably no, but it seems to me that the majority of the rules are of
> the type "move" or "with probability p convert neighbor (or myself) from
> type X into type Y". And these types of rules could be presented in a
> compact notation. So, what is the situation regarding a notation ??
>
> Thanks,
> Axel
|
|
|