MASON-INTEREST-L Archives

August 2015

MASON-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2015 23:41:14 -0700
Reply-To:
MASON Multiagent Simulation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Paul Smaldino <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
MASON Multiagent Simulation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
No. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something.

Sent via space magic. 

> On Aug 7, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Axel Kowald <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Everybody,
> 
> I wonder if there is an agreed upon notation for the representation of
> agent rules?
> 
> Since agents can perform arbitrarily complex rules the general answer is
> probably no, but it seems to me that the majority of the rules are of
> the type "move" or "with probability p convert neighbor (or myself) from
> type X into type Y". And these types of rules could be presented in a
> compact notation. So, what is the situation regarding a notation ??
> 
> Thanks,
>   Axel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2