Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:59:17 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Am 16.08.2013 00:08, schrieb Sean Luke:
> I'm not exactly sure what you're asking here, so I'll give two scenarios.
>
> [...]
>
> Scenario 2. You have agents that you want to schedule repeating forever. They're all stepped once per timestep. Each timestep, after all of them have been stepped, you'd like the Results steppable to be called.
>
> In this situation, simply schedule the Results steppable repeating, but with an ordering that is higher than that of the agents. By default agents are scheduled with an ordering of 0. So if you scheduled the Results steppable with an ordering of 1 (say), it'd be stepped each timestep, but after the agents have all been stepped.
that was exactly, what I meant. Sorry for describing the problem not
good enough. And thanks for the answer. I thought that it could work
like you described it now but I wasn't sure. Nice that you verified
that. And good to know that 1 is already sufficient.
Thank you again,
Norman
|
|
|