MARCEDIT-L Archives

June 2016

MARCEDIT-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joseph Frawley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
MarcEdit support in technical and instructional matters <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:27:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
This question may be slightly off topic, as not directly related to the Marc Edit software, but I'm hoping I can find some help from those more knowledegable than I about marc record structure.

We have identified a large group of records in our database that fail to load when we export them to our discovery layer/catalog. The reason is the record length, and usually has to do with the last portion of the leader, position 20-23.  

Library of Congress' documentation on MARC 21 communications format indicates that pos. 20-23 ends with "4500".  But is this always the case?  Is there ever a valid reason for it to contain anything else?  And what do the digits 4500 signify?

We are considering doing a global data change to correct all these records that do not end in 4500 in the leader, but I want to understand the implications of that, and wonder if I could possibly be doing harm without really understanding what I am correcting and why.

Thanks to anyone for any insights,

Joe Frawley
Connecticut College
Phone: 860-439-2670
[log in to unmask]

________________________________________________________________________

This message comes to you via MARCEDIT-L, a Listserv(R) list for technical and instructional support in MarcEdit.  If you wish to communicate directly with the list owners, write to [log in to unmask] To unsubscribe, send a message "SIGNOFF MARCEDIT-L" to [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2