Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:27:18 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Michael:
Sorry -- we don't have one to offer, but if there are specific markers in the existing plain-vanilla contents note that introduce
data belonging in particular enhanced subfields, it seems direct text replacements might work better than regular expressions.
Could you give us an example or two of what data (MARC or delimited) you're starting from?
Some issues to consider:
Do you already have column delimiters, punctuation or prepositions that introduce statements of responsibility?
Are there any volume/chapter/section/disc numbers, or parenthetical duration statements present that should map to 505 $g?
Is punctuation and spacing between contents items consistent?
Do you have more than one level of analysis (works within 4 vols., cuts within 3 discs, sheets within 2 containers, etc.)?
Doug Rippey, CT-IV
University of Denver
Penrose Library Serials Dept.
doug dot rippey at du dot edu
303-668-7669 (mobile)
-----Original Message-----
From: MarcEdit support in technical and instructional matters [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael J Dulock
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: regular expression for enhancing 505 contents note
---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: MarcEdit support in technical and instructional matters
________________________________________________________________________
This message comes to you via MARCEDIT-L, a Listserv(R) list for technical and instructional support in MarcEdit. If you wish to communicate directly with the list owners, write to [log in to unmask] To unsubscribe, send a message "SIGNOFF MARCEDIT-L" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|