Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:51:00 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Margaret Wilson asked me:
> When I was working with the Springer Springer records, as opposed to
> the OCLC Springer records, some of them did not have a DOI. Is that no
> longer the case with the OCLC Springer records? Do any of the non-
> Springer URLs have DOIs?
I have found a small number (half a dozen) OCLC SpringerLink records that did not have DOI URLs. I was able to figure out what the correct DOI was for each of these records, and posted my results on the BATCH listserv. I can look it up for you if you need it.
So far, we have not found any records in the OCLC WCS set for SpringerLink which had a DOI URL for any vendor except SpringerLink, but I can't say for sure that will always be true. We considered using a different piece of text, such as the $3, to identify the SpringerLink URLs, but we weren't certain whether it was consistent enough.
Steve McDonald
[log in to unmask]
________________________________________________________________________
This message comes to you via MARCEDIT-L, a Listserv(R) list for technical and instructional support in MarcEdit. If you wish to communicate directly with the list owners, write to [log in to unmask] To unsubscribe, send a message "SIGNOFF MARCEDIT-L" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|