MARCEDIT-L Archives

January 2015

MARCEDIT-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Terry Reese <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
MarcEdit support in technical and instructional matters <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:22:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
When doing the merge process, I actually recommend letting MarcEdit use the
MARC21 option.  This does the control number matching by default (and more
advanced control number matching) and works on multiple, repeating fields.
However, for records like these, where match points exist in different
fields, it also uses the entire records themselves to create matches.  You
would want to test the accuracy, but it's likely as good, or better, than
any matching OCLC does within WorldCat to merge duplicate records.

--tr

-----Original Message-----
From: MarcEdit support in technical and instructional matters
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Malone
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MARCEDIT-L] Replacing "missing" LC call numbers

We are currently a DDC library and our library catalog contains myriads of
records that had the LC call numbers stripped from our records. We would
like to embark upon a project whereby we reinsert these call numbers back
into the files. 

We currently do not use OCLC's WorldShare Metadata Collection Manager,
though plans are being made to begin such in the future. We have also added
a great deal of local enhancement to our records, which may or may not have
been updated to the OCLC master record (which creates some concern as we
look to the future rollout of the bibliographic update service).

So, I've laid out a process whereby we can identify and download OCLC
records by number, as well as those in our catalog without an 050 or 090.
The goal is to merge two files using a matchpoint. The difficulty is that
sometimes the matchpoint will be the 035, but if OCLC has merged records
since our acquiring and cataloging a resource, the matchpoint would be an
035 in our local record and an 019 in the OCLC record.

I've got the 035 to 035 process down, but any suggestions on how to account
for the matchpoint residing in different fields?

Is the solution to copy the 019 to multiple 035s? If so, how can a single
019 be split into multiple 035s? Also, during the merge process MARCEdit can
handle repeating fields, but it wants to know which field is to be the
matchpoint.

Any recommendations would be welcome. 

David B. Malone, MLIS, CA
Associate Professor
Buswell Memorial Library
Wheaton College
501 College Ave.
Wheaton IL 60187-5593
630.752.5707  | 630.752.5987 FAX
[log in to unmask]  |  http://library.wheaton.edu

________________________________________________________________________

This message comes to you via MARCEDIT-L, a Listserv(R) list for technical
and instructional support in MarcEdit.  If you wish to communicate directly
with the list owners, write to [log in to unmask] To
unsubscribe, send a message "SIGNOFF MARCEDIT-L" to
[log in to unmask]

________________________________________________________________________

This message comes to you via MARCEDIT-L, a Listserv(R) list for technical and instructional support in MarcEdit.  If you wish to communicate directly with the list owners, write to [log in to unmask] To unsubscribe, send a message "SIGNOFF MARCEDIT-L" to [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2