LISTSERV - ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

November 2007

ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	ECJ-INTEREST-L Home
	ECJ-INTEREST-L November 2007

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Has anyone ever brought up the patent issue?
From:	Matthew Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:41:11 +1300
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (11 lines)

Robert Baruch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't see any discussion about this in the list archives... was 
> there ever any hesitation about putting an implementation of GP into 
> ECJ considering the patents Koza has on GP? What motivated the 
> decision to include GP in spite of that? Just curious :)

Is there an argument about "prior art"?  
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/genetic_programming/message/2646

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.GMU.EDU