Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:06:49 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_35059_30102020.1213315609913" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That's great news! I checked out the code and am now looking at the
ec\eval\README file. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Sean Luke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Actually it's been running stably and elegantly for a while now, but it's
> on CVS, not a snapshot yet. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we gotta get a snapshot out.
> :-) Not much documentation yet either, though we're available for
> discussion.
>
> If you need a copy and can't get it off of CVS, let me know and I can tar
> one up and throw it at ya.
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Shane wrote:
>
> Sean,
>>
>> A while back you mentioned a new version of ecj that would have
>> asynchronous evals. I am looking forward to this, since my problems have
>> long eval times. It would be nice to have multiple processes/computers
>> working on them in parallel. Would you please give me an update on your
>> progress?
>>
>> Shane
>>
>>
|
|
|