ECJ-INTEREST-L Archives

May 2007

ECJ-INTEREST-L@LISTSERV.GMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Drozd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ECJ Evolutionary Computation Toolkit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 May 2007 12:09:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hello,
I am intersted in evolving solutions to a agent based control problem where
the solution consists of 3 GP trees.  It seems that it would be possible for
me to either approach this from a coevolutionary perspective and maintain 3
populations of single-tree individuals, or have a single population where
each individual consists of 3 GP trees. (All trees use the same set of
parameters/function operators). 

What would be the difference between using these two approaches? It seems to
me that given each of the 3 functions have a very different purpose,
coevolution would be a more techinically accurate path of evolution.
However, it also seems to be more computationally intensive.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2