Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:25:36 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've already talked about this with Mark, and he agreed to license DRM
under the AFL for the purposes of this project, quoting:
> Alberto, I hereby grant you permission to use DRM source code
> under the AFL for the purposes of your project.
> Mark
Anyway, I think that DRM should continue to be GPL as of now, its
purpose is more general than being only an ECJ module and there is a lot
of people other than Mark that could have an opinion on licensing of the
library. And although it has its own cvs at sourceforge I think it is
right to have a frozen working version of DRM on contrib.
All the code I produced (ec.drm) is AFL, although comments about it
should be probably changed.
Cheers,
Alberto
Sean Luke escribió:
> Alberto, if you're thinking of uploading DRM, you could do that, or
> you could just have a pointer to Mark Jelasity's site.
>
> Some gotchas:
>
> 1. All of Mark's code is GPL. If you've used some of his code
> snippets in your own, you can't release as AFL without his
> permission. You'd have to release as GPL.
>
> 2. If your code is GPL, it *must* stay in contrib -- ECJ's main core
> is 100% AFL.
>
> 3. If Mark thinks it's okay, I have no problem with the DRM module
> sitting as a subdirectory inside your contrib space (drm/drm maybe?)
>
> Sean
|
|
|